Difference between revisions of "Talk:GBrowse syn"
From GMOD
(→Behind the scenes) |
(→Miscellaneous) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=== Miscellaneous === | === Miscellaneous === | ||
| − | * The GBsyn blocks look really nice. Can you add something similar to GBrowse to guide the eye between the overview, region and details panels? | + | * The GBsyn 'alignment blocks' look really nice. Can you add something similar to GBrowse to guide the eye between the overview, region and details panels? |
Revision as of 15:55, 4 November 2010
Contents
Upcoming Hackathon (7/11/2010)
Here are some ideas for things to work on w.r.t GBsyn dev. etc.
User interface
- The tracks don't 'feel' like GB 2.0 tracks, and are described in the manual as 'gbrowse-like'. Why can't we have proper GBrowse tracks? Wouldn't this allow a lot of code to be refactored?
- I'd like to use my existing track configuration to configure tracks in GBsyn. Additional options could be added to the GBsyn conf to turn tracks off, because its a pain to reconfigure them all from scratch again (especially using GBrowse 1.7 syntax) for GBsyn.
- I'd like a global configuration file, like GBrowse 2.0 now has. To get anything up and running you need a specific config file, which feels wrong somehow.
- Sometimes the alignment is broken into blocks (each one should be a bona fide GB track remember) can we have a uniform scale across all blocks? I think small blocks are sometimes drawn to a different scale.
- The rendering of rulers in small blocks is crappy
Behind the scenes
- Oh, also, could you go ahead and make GBrowse_syn run under fastcgi? kthxbai
Miscellaneous
- The GBsyn 'alignment blocks' look really nice. Can you add something similar to GBrowse to guide the eye between the overview, region and details panels?
