Stock Relationship Ontology

From GMOD
Revision as of 10:25, 1 June 2010 by Maccallr (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This page serves as an initial draft of the nascent Stock Relationship Ontology.

Talk page

If you are too shy to edit this page, then please add your suggested terms or comments on the talk page.


stock types

  • term
    • is_a subterm

Proposed relations (by Pantelis Topalis 28 May 2010)

Based on what it is written in this page, we can use the following relations (please comment / add / modify as required).

  • is_a (OBO_REL:is_a)
  • part_of (OBO_REL:part_of)
  • derives_from (OBO_REL:derives_from)
  • is_parent_of
  • is_offspring_of
  • is_member_of

stock_relationship types

(the following is largely taken from a prior VB wiki dealing with the same issue. I've put them here as a conversation starter only - feel free to delete / alter / extend as required) Sethnr 13:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

individual -> individual

  • parent -> offspring
  • individual -> RNAi treated individual

individual -> group

  • parents -> offspring
  • parent -> offspring (i.e. isofem)
  • pool of individuals

group -> individual

  • individual from pool (e.g. single sequenced individual from field collection)
  • individual under gen. modification (e.g. RNAi?)

group -> group

  • sub-population from larger population
  • group->group RNAi (and other experimental manipulations)
  • bred lines from lab stocks

nd_assay_stock types

Here is one distinction we may all need to make: assays that use stocks and assays that generate stocks. I suggest the following but it is a bit computer-sciency! Maccallr 10:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

  • assay_input_stock
  • assay_output_stock

Should the amount of stock used/generated be recorded in nd_assay_stockprop? Or should we have nd_assay_stock.types like 'stock sample', 'entire stock'? Maccallr 10:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

nd_assay types