Difference between revisions of "Stock Relationship Ontology"
(→stock_relationship types) |
(→nd_assay_stock types) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* term | * term | ||
** is_a subterm | ** is_a subterm | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Proposed relations (by [[User:Pantelis Topalis|Pantelis Topalis]] 28 May 2010)== | ||
+ | Based on what it is written in this page, we can use the following relations (please comment / add / modify as required). | ||
+ | |||
+ | * is_a (OBO_REL:is_a) | ||
+ | * part_of (OBO_REL:part_of) | ||
+ | * derives_from (OBO_REL:derives_from) | ||
+ | * is_parent_of | ||
+ | * is_offspring_of | ||
+ | * is_member_of | ||
==stock_relationship types== | ==stock_relationship types== | ||
Line 31: | Line 41: | ||
==nd_assay_stock types== | ==nd_assay_stock types== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here is one distinction we may all need to make: assays that '''use''' stocks and assays that '''generate''' stocks. I suggest the following but it is a bit computer-sciency! [[User:Maccallr|Maccallr]] 10:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * assay_input_stock | ||
+ | * assay_output_stock | ||
+ | |||
+ | Should the amount of stock used/generated be recorded in nd_assay_stockprop? Or should we have nd_assay_stock.types like 'stock sample', 'entire stock'? [[User:Maccallr|Maccallr]] 10:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
==nd_assay types== | ==nd_assay types== |
Latest revision as of 10:25, 1 June 2010
This page serves as an initial draft of the nascent Stock Relationship Ontology.
Contents
Talk page
If you are too shy to edit this page, then please add your suggested terms or comments on the talk page.
stock types
- term
- is_a subterm
Proposed relations (by Pantelis Topalis 28 May 2010)
Based on what it is written in this page, we can use the following relations (please comment / add / modify as required).
- is_a (OBO_REL:is_a)
- part_of (OBO_REL:part_of)
- derives_from (OBO_REL:derives_from)
- is_parent_of
- is_offspring_of
- is_member_of
stock_relationship types
(the following is largely taken from a prior VB wiki dealing with the same issue. I've put them here as a conversation starter only - feel free to delete / alter / extend as required) Sethnr 13:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
individual -> individual
- parent -> offspring
- individual -> RNAi treated individual
individual -> group
- parents -> offspring
- parent -> offspring (i.e. isofem)
- pool of individuals
group -> individual
- individual from pool (e.g. single sequenced individual from field collection)
- individual under gen. modification (e.g. RNAi?)
group -> group
- sub-population from larger population
- group->group RNAi (and other experimental manipulations)
- bred lines from lab stocks
nd_assay_stock types
Here is one distinction we may all need to make: assays that use stocks and assays that generate stocks. I suggest the following but it is a bit computer-sciency! Maccallr 10:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- assay_input_stock
- assay_output_stock
Should the amount of stock used/generated be recorded in nd_assay_stockprop? Or should we have nd_assay_stock.types like 'stock sample', 'entire stock'? Maccallr 10:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)